I never said you have to say you agree with me. After all I was simply - and clearly - responding to your point about “most people”; if by “most people” you meant me then I’m sorry, I didn’t realise. I also don’t see why you would think someone would get such pleasure from people saying they agree with them. Unless it is something you do. And if it is, please don’t have the belief that everyone is like that.
And, again, if it’s too hard for you to understand (and yet I’m the stupid moron/fool apparently) I was simply finishing off my points now that I had the full interview in front of me and not a short excerpt.
The main basis for people’s (and my) opinion about the “PD coming to the Rev” subject was the fact the interviewed person did not seem to even mention the name of the game by himself at all.
And yet, one of your lasts posts in the previous thread was explaining how that person did in fact mention it. Something which was NOT visible in that excerpt.
My response was that I could only comment on what I had in front of me and what I had in front of me did not show that fact.
I see nothing wrong with wanting to finish off my view about the subject since after this kind of final posts it really doesn’t look settled at all to me and now I could finally see the full interview for the first time.
Since at this point you make the fact this could have never been a PD game announcement appear so obvious (just to give yourself some ground to trash me from) I don’t see why the previous thread was created by you on first place.
Moreover, if I’m such a stupid moron/fool then I don’t see why YOU bother replying to me.
As for why I am replying to you, it is because the forums aren’t just for you and me, wether you created the thread or not. And I’ll obviously defend myself from such outrageous accusations as you have been doing. Especially when it’s so easy to do so and doesn’t take any effort whatsoever.
On top of that, I said I don’t care enough about your opinion to be offended by it, hinting - rather heavily - at the fact I was talking about your opinion about me. With such low tactics as attempting to make me look like some egotistical bastard with the only basis for it being some amazing speculation about how I feel when people agree with me or whatever - and on top of that calling me names for no reason whatsoever - I don’t see why I should.
Despite that, since this is a forum and not your personal blog, you’ll see a lot of replying from me wether the thread is created by you or not.
PS: I still fail to see the reason behind your name calling. Bad childhood? Tough luck but many people have had that so get over it. Name calling on a forum like this is inexcusable. Words can slip while talking angered sometimes - though I don’t see why all this would be enough to anger you - but when typing things out they simply don’t. Especially when you have all the time in the world to edit something before hitting submit. I of course don’t expect you to show respect to me - or anyone who has ever argued with you apparently - but the least you can do is show respect to the rest people since everyone has kept this forum free of such comments and this all changed with your arrival.
Do you think name calling has some kind of literal value and is a worthy addition to this board?
Funny mental image, if this was you talking you would probably say something along the lines of “calling other people names makes you feel good about yourself with that low esteem of yours and with how people treat you in real life” since it’s the kind of trash talking you’ve been doing about me lol…
Anyway, if you really MUST use that language please do it in a private message, wether it’s directed to me or not, so that this board can remain as trash free as it was before you came along.
[/quote]