I’m sorry I offended your beloved reviewer by claiming he doesn’t know what he’s talking about when he clearly doesn’t given the misinformation sprinkled all over his half assed review. Being entertained or not is subjective for sure, but mistakes about facts shouldn’t be accepted as opinion, and his opinion of the game’s flaws is flawed itself since its based on false facts. Such mistakes happen in IGN reviews also mind you.
Prove what you promise. If you can’t, I’ll say there’s a chance you’re wrong. After all, the comments section there does include comments where people’s opinion appears to be swayed by that review. Sure, they’re being naive, and that was my point, that there are naive people out there that can be swayed with misinformation. Of course, once again, that wasn’t my main point or why I said that in the first place. I merely made an observation following Chizzles’ comment etc, etc, read my last comment.
PS: I love how you tell me off for pretending I know what real gaming is about then you go on to give your own definitive view of what real gaming is about showing how you know better and implying I think it’s something else. My only point was that it was a narrow sighted review from an individual unable to appreciate and evaluate not only how succesfully it offers it, but what it attempts to offer in the first place, since he never goes deep enough to discover its breadth of gameplay beyond the basics. Not any definition for what gaming is. I love (good) FPS games myself anyway, among tons of other genres. On the other hand I never got into RTS games so I’d never pretend to know what I’m talking about and would never evaluate such a game, other than simply say I think the single game of the genre I enjoyed was great (Warhammer: Dark Omen if anyone cares).