Edited with a fewstatements] to show your next response is also bullshit circle jerking.
Ok, seriously, what the fuck? You’re the one who brought up UE3 game issues as a reason it’s so bad your own words: you just called it poor instead of shit - many times over - so no twists here no matter what you want to believe] on consoles, while praising MT Framework. All I did there is present that what you praise also has such issues, to a severe degree, depending on the title. This should have allowed you to acknowledge the obvious, that I’ve been trying to explain in the first place. That is not that I think MT Framework is bad, or worse than UE3. That obvious thing is that it’s always up to the developer yes, I took the time to post it, since you always blame the shitty “poor” UE3 instead of the developer, despite acknowledging Epic’s own games tend to lack such issues, despite Capcom’s own MT Framework - which you keep praising as so superior to shitty “poor” UE3 - games often having similar issues] (and the development conditions imposed by the publisher, the market, the whole money deal, etc) to utilise a tool like UE3 or MT Framework to the best of their ability, an ability which (surprise!) varies from studio to studio, and that there’s no magic recipe for an engine that will make all issues disappear from all video games. And all this doesn’t mean UE3 or any other engine is bad. So, yes, you can keep circle jerking and mention some more UE3 games that have a few, or many, issues here and there did you read the sentence before this one? you neglected to quote it in favor of just the next one, when I’ve already addressed the point you made right here], you can even list some absolutely shitty UE3 titles, as if it means anything at all, but you’re better off to instead understand the simple concepts presented to you and just, not.
As for the rest, I’m really sorry TA, but you didn’t add anything new to the discussion, just some more broken English, broken memories, broken logic, willful ignorance, and circle jerking that I could respond to by just quoting my last comment word to word. I’ll instead let you go back and read it yourself and wait for a proper response before replying to you.
I’ve tried many times but it doesn’t work with someone who holds three year grudges over, at the time, friendly debates he claimed to enjoy. Seriously, when I found that thread I expected a shitfest as seen here, but it all went down much better (outside occasional heated moments or instances where he once again didn’t get what I was saying quite right, and I had to repeat it in different ways) where I even defended him from misunderstandings with Parn, which is when he mentioned he enjoyed the debate. Yet here he is, years later, still bringing it up as if it’s a discussion I made no sense in, contradicted myself in, made a fool of myself in, treated him unjustly in, or whatever the fuck his point was when he brought it up here, in the Bayonetta thread, in the E3 2008 thread, in the Kinect thread, in seemingly every damn thread I write in. Imagine how he is with things he didn’t enjoy.
I apparently must be completely wrong, UE3 must be shit outside Epic, Sonic 4 must be good, Bourne must be an example for SEGA to look up to just because it’s slightly shinier than Kenzan, Bourne’s flaws must exist because of how shit UE3 must be and there’s absolutely no room for opinion and different angles to view something, anything from. Only “facts”, like that Super Mario Galaxy also has some bugs so you absolutely can’t hate Sonic 4 yet not hate that, you can’t point out factual errors in reviews if you can at the same time accept that someone who didn’t play a game doesn’t want to actually buy it, you can’t claim some motion control methods worked well, when implemented well, because better motion control technology appeared since, etc. In short, every post I’ve made in the past three years, or since I joined, has to be factually wrong if TA here happens to think otherwise.
One can only play nice for so long before giving up on etiquette that is neither returned nor, in the end, worth the effort. Not for him. Especially when 80% of my posts has to be an elaborate equivalent to “wtf, I did not, wtf, you did so” as if this guy has been taking my posts and his replies through babelfish or google. Shit, in the end, I’m not who brought up all that random shit in a fucking Sonic thread. How do you reason with the one who did?
Anyway, I’m sorry for the rant, I didn’t mean to bite your head off.
