Should we really call that kind of games RPGs though?
They are more just turn based strategy games really, the only thing they have in common with RPGs it the exp points and such but that’s not the definition of an RPG.
To me Tactics Ogre, FFT, Vandal Hearts, FM and such games are not really RPGs.
While the Shining Force series IS since you still do everything you do in a proper RPG except the battles are expanded in a way that they become a turn based strategy…
Man FFT…brings back memories, that story is worthy of a novel imo. Even tho the english translation was chunky. And the battles are as good as any of the Tactics Ogre games (it was made by the same team mind you, it’s basically a Tactics Ogre game except given a FF facelift for the items and spell names and such) But the story…damn, best that team has given us for sure. And you gotta love the art as well!
I tried the new GBA tactics Ogre game and it’s REALLY good by the way, the story seems very in depth as well except I got a little bored, but maybe it picks up pace later, I don’t know. Great game and much better than I thought it would be on GBA.
While on the other hand FFT advance just plain sucks… I was expecting a story worthy of being the succesor to FFT and what I get is a kiddy storyline that could be described in a couple lines…
It’s still a good game but I’d go for Tactics Ogre: Knight of Lodis if I were to chose between them since the story is a really importand part of games to me. I want to be involved, not be “Addicted” in the same way you get addicted to puzzle games even without a story… I need more than that :
Anyway…if anyone’s wondering what the games in my first reply here are then just ask and I’ll post links for them